It was surprisingly difficult to find this next NGO. Apparently MK and Americans have different definitions of certain words upon giving directions. After 3 phone calls and 20 minutes we were finally able to meet. It made me VERY apprehensive for the meeting, as English was the main problem in the communication in the directions. However, the meeting went decent, not great, but still very good. The NGO is trying to be very active and is actually making a difference in Macedonia.
Association HOPS (Healthy Options Project Skopje) is an NGO that works for those that society often ignores. Most of their biographical information is from a handout as they just referred me to a printout. They began in 1997 as a needle exchange center (meaning that they give out free clean needles to drug users in exchange for dirty ones no questions asked to stop the spread of HIV/AIDS/STDs) as part of the Soros Foundation. Their mission is to promote, respect and protect human rights and liberties aiming to promote health and socioeconomic status of all people, especially drug users, sex workers and other marginalized communities based on the principles of harm reduction through equal access to services, empowerment of the community, capacity building, research, analysis and advocacy. They developed different programs to serve these communities. In 2001, they began to build the capacity of programs in Strumica, Bitola and Ohrid to offer the same programs as they had in Skopje. Then in 2004, they began working with the Ministry of Health to implement activities from the National Coordinated Response to HIV/AIDS. HOPS, along with the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria, opened programs in Kumanovo, Kavadarci, Stip, Ohrid and Gostivar. This grew into the Macedonian Harm Reduction Network founded in 2005 with 20 members.
While HOPS originally began working with drug users, they turned to sex workers as well in 200. Mostly to help prevent HIV/AIDS in their population and families. They offer a daily center for sex workers to go to to relax and get condoms or health care.
Currently there are 13 NGOs that are working in harm reduction with 15 needle exchange centers. The main issue is quality/availability for the population they are trying to serve. Currently they serve about 9-1,000 unique people annually. Many people come back in everyday, but they receive a special identifying number to track them so that the numbers are not incorrect. They do not have to give any specific information (like names or the MK version of social security numbers) just enough information to use the same number every day. However, you can not provide services to those who are under 18 here without a parent’s permission. So if someone tells them that they are under 18, they can not give them condoms or clean needles. But, if they say they are 18, you are allowed to treat them (even if they look younger).
There are roughly 8-10,000 “problematic” drug users in the country and roughly 50% are reached through these exchange centers. HOPS is continuing to scale up these centers as well as focus on quality care. HOPS only works with the non-stimulant drug users (such as with heroin, methadone, or cocaine).
These centers provide counseling for people who might want to get off drugs or out of the sex trade. They also can help them fill out official paperwork to receive state aid or whatever they are trying to do. (You need the state ID card in order to receive the state run health care services.) There are state run addiction clinics to help people come off of drugs, but they are only for those who are getting out of prison and they aren’t accepting any other patients as of now. HOPS is in the process of trying to set up other clinics in Skopje but no municipality wants to have that clinic near them. They do also offer services to sex workers who want to escape that life style, but they then stated “They choose to be sex workers and we can’t help them.” (Further stating that in a 30% unemployment climate, who would hire them for legitimate jobs?)
HOPS is in the process of re-structuring their services. They want to provide education in the centers, complete research about the drug problems in MK, and provide advocacy (to lobby the government to provide the services needed to fulfill people’s needs). HOPS hopes through education they can convince drug users to not make as risky decisions. They are involved in building capacities in the local government/municipalities or other NGOs often through trainings
Most of HOPS money comes from international sources, but there are some funds that are domestically based (not totally functioning). When HOPS applies internationally, they do so with the government who will then get the majority of the funds to re-distribute. There is good implementation of their services, but HOPS finds it difficult to work with the government. While HOPS is currently searching for new international donors, they will try to work more closely with the government for funding. The government provides the medication for HIV/AIDS but not for the needle exchanges. The City of Skopje, specifically center, does help with one of the exchange centers but it does cover their rent and helps to fund some creative workshops.According to HOPS, philanthropy in MK isn’t seen as intrinsically good, but even if people donate, they do not give to the marginalized. Also, neither government party wants to help. (A benefit to this, is that HOPS is never accused of being part of the government or opposition.) The government does, however, utilize the resources of HOPS when it pleases them (such as when they need data for a report).
Showing posts with label citizenship. Show all posts
Showing posts with label citizenship. Show all posts
Monday, March 5, 2012
Monday, February 20, 2012
Disabilities in MK
The meeting with Polio Plus (only in MK, the EN page is not working) was a bit different than my other meetings. I recently met a Political Officer at the Embassy who has been giving me some more contacts with NGOs. She had a meeting scheduled with Polio Plus, who I had been trying to meet with for about 2 months, and invited me along. This made for some different observations and discussions that I usually had. They were more direct in asking the US government for help, specifically stating that “we” should help them lobby. At the same time, they were much more critical of the current government and their actions regarding people with disabilities than many NGOs I had visited. I was able to learn most of what I would by myself. I might try to email them a few more questions soon. As I was typing this up, I realized that I actually learned more about how disabilities are treated in MK than I did about Polio Plus, so this is more about that than the organization (thus the reason I am putting it on my travel blog and waiting to publish it on my research blog!).
They had one of the larger offices that I had seen in Skopje. The had one large office room/entry way where there were three desks and a seating area set up, then there were two smaller rooms off to the side, with a conference room in the back. We met in the conference room.
They tend to focus on policy implementation and legislative changes, rather than services to the people. They do help those who are disabled fight for their legal rights. They do provide some services, such as mediation in the labor market, providing legal advice (such as how to make complaints), and helping them write business plans.
They are mainly funded from international organizations or embassies. The funds are small for NGOs in MK especially if you are focused solely on one issue. Even further, disability is lower on the funding tier in all locations, according to Polio Plus. Disabilities have received some funds from the state, roughly 2 million Euros, but it only goes to the older Union of Disabilities that was set up by the state. In the Union of Disabilities, there are 7 separate organizations that provide services to the disabled. The regulations, however, are from the Yugoslav era. The funding also only goes to the traditional organizations that use the medical approach.
Like in the US and elsewhere, disabilities still face harsh discrimination. Although in MK people with disabilities are almost all treated as if they are “crazy” or “have something wrong” or “aren’t normal and need to be excluded from daily life.” There is a law on discrimination that, according to Polio Plus, is actually discriminatory. In order to be hired as a manager or someone above the bottom level of employment, you have to be tested if you have a disability. The person with a disability, be it mental or physical, has to prove that they are mentally capable by going to a medical commission that examines their ability to work. All people with a disability are grouped together, in the guise of protecting those with mental disabilities.
There is no “gate-keeping” for disability status in MK. Almost any one can be declared disabled. The government then provides a subsidy for the disability (roughly 7,000 MKD/month minimum[$150]). However, with all of the “extras” that people might qualify for, they could end up getting 15-16,000 MKD/month [$318-340]. This is a decent salary in MK, and thus provides no incentive for them to go out and search for work on their own, especially if they are employed at all (even part time), they only get the lower 7,000 plus their salary.
Polio Plus submitted the first (and only so far) Citizen’s Initiative law to the MK parliament. It was essentially a law to retrofit all building to make them handicapped accessible. In order to do this, you have to get 10,000 signatures. To get these, you can’t just sign them with a notary, oh no, you have to go into your local governmental office with an official register and sign there after proving that you are who you say you are. They submitted this law a while ago, but there has been no movement on it in the Parliament. The word is that this law would be too expensive to implement, so they aren’t voting on it.
In the years that Polio Plus has been around (12), there has been a change in the attitudes of people towards those with disabilities, but it is slim to none. The example they gave, is that if in 1991 those with disabilities were considered at step 1 to the rest of society being at step 5, now they are at 5 while the rest of society is at 10.They were trying to show that while changes have been made, those with disabilities are still the last considered group of people. Many people here do not have a creative mentality, and they believe that change is taking too long to occur. While many work to solve the issues that people with disabilities face, no real progress is being made. There has been a shift from institutionalization to community based care, but not enough of one.
They claimed that almost no one is motivated to learn to work with those with disabilities because it takes too much work. There is some training available, but mostly it is in the medical approach. (which is a way of thinking about “what they can NOT do” rather than what the CAN do. According to BFI’s educational resources, the medical approach sees the disabled people as the problem. That the people who are disabled need to be adapted to fit in the world as it is, and if this isn’t possible, they need to be hidden. I had to look this up as I was not quite sure what she meant by the medical approach).
They have tried to work closely with different Members of Parliament, and different governmental bodies, but the others often do not want to work with those with disabilities (they don’t make as good of a picture story). Polio Plus isn’t sure how to change the system. They have to be extra cautious on how they try to change things.
There is also a group of companies called “Shelter Companies” (this lead to a bit of miscommunication in the beginning of the description), because they “shelter” those who are disabled. In these companies they must meet a few regulations: have a minimum of 10 people working, with 4 of them with disabilities. They must also keep the people with disabilities employed for 3 years, and in the second company where the person is hired, they have to be employed for 5 years. They get the following benefits as a way of getting companies to hire more people with disabilities:
The companies can request this after 9 months of employing the people with disabilities. Mainly the companies in graphics and printing take advantage of this program. However, there is a large scale abuse in this program. There is a commission that has to determine if you meet the standards for receiving this aid, and it is staffed by those who are connected. They often run the companies that are already receiving this aid and therefore have no desire to allow more companies into this special tax zone.
They had one of the larger offices that I had seen in Skopje. The had one large office room/entry way where there were three desks and a seating area set up, then there were two smaller rooms off to the side, with a conference room in the back. We met in the conference room.
They tend to focus on policy implementation and legislative changes, rather than services to the people. They do help those who are disabled fight for their legal rights. They do provide some services, such as mediation in the labor market, providing legal advice (such as how to make complaints), and helping them write business plans.
They are mainly funded from international organizations or embassies. The funds are small for NGOs in MK especially if you are focused solely on one issue. Even further, disability is lower on the funding tier in all locations, according to Polio Plus. Disabilities have received some funds from the state, roughly 2 million Euros, but it only goes to the older Union of Disabilities that was set up by the state. In the Union of Disabilities, there are 7 separate organizations that provide services to the disabled. The regulations, however, are from the Yugoslav era. The funding also only goes to the traditional organizations that use the medical approach.
Like in the US and elsewhere, disabilities still face harsh discrimination. Although in MK people with disabilities are almost all treated as if they are “crazy” or “have something wrong” or “aren’t normal and need to be excluded from daily life.” There is a law on discrimination that, according to Polio Plus, is actually discriminatory. In order to be hired as a manager or someone above the bottom level of employment, you have to be tested if you have a disability. The person with a disability, be it mental or physical, has to prove that they are mentally capable by going to a medical commission that examines their ability to work. All people with a disability are grouped together, in the guise of protecting those with mental disabilities.
There is no “gate-keeping” for disability status in MK. Almost any one can be declared disabled. The government then provides a subsidy for the disability (roughly 7,000 MKD/month minimum[$150]). However, with all of the “extras” that people might qualify for, they could end up getting 15-16,000 MKD/month [$318-340]. This is a decent salary in MK, and thus provides no incentive for them to go out and search for work on their own, especially if they are employed at all (even part time), they only get the lower 7,000 plus their salary.
Polio Plus submitted the first (and only so far) Citizen’s Initiative law to the MK parliament. It was essentially a law to retrofit all building to make them handicapped accessible. In order to do this, you have to get 10,000 signatures. To get these, you can’t just sign them with a notary, oh no, you have to go into your local governmental office with an official register and sign there after proving that you are who you say you are. They submitted this law a while ago, but there has been no movement on it in the Parliament. The word is that this law would be too expensive to implement, so they aren’t voting on it.
In the years that Polio Plus has been around (12), there has been a change in the attitudes of people towards those with disabilities, but it is slim to none. The example they gave, is that if in 1991 those with disabilities were considered at step 1 to the rest of society being at step 5, now they are at 5 while the rest of society is at 10.They were trying to show that while changes have been made, those with disabilities are still the last considered group of people. Many people here do not have a creative mentality, and they believe that change is taking too long to occur. While many work to solve the issues that people with disabilities face, no real progress is being made. There has been a shift from institutionalization to community based care, but not enough of one.
They claimed that almost no one is motivated to learn to work with those with disabilities because it takes too much work. There is some training available, but mostly it is in the medical approach. (which is a way of thinking about “what they can NOT do” rather than what the CAN do. According to BFI’s educational resources, the medical approach sees the disabled people as the problem. That the people who are disabled need to be adapted to fit in the world as it is, and if this isn’t possible, they need to be hidden. I had to look this up as I was not quite sure what she meant by the medical approach).
They have tried to work closely with different Members of Parliament, and different governmental bodies, but the others often do not want to work with those with disabilities (they don’t make as good of a picture story). Polio Plus isn’t sure how to change the system. They have to be extra cautious on how they try to change things.
There is also a group of companies called “Shelter Companies” (this lead to a bit of miscommunication in the beginning of the description), because they “shelter” those who are disabled. In these companies they must meet a few regulations: have a minimum of 10 people working, with 4 of them with disabilities. They must also keep the people with disabilities employed for 3 years, and in the second company where the person is hired, they have to be employed for 5 years. They get the following benefits as a way of getting companies to hire more people with disabilities:
- they don’t have to pay taxes for any of the people working for them
- The state can pay between 20-100% of the salaries in the form of a grant (less common)
- The companies do not pay the profit taxes.
- The customs fees are free
- they get reimbursed for 10,000 MKD for equipment.
- The social packages are covered by the government for all workers
The companies can request this after 9 months of employing the people with disabilities. Mainly the companies in graphics and printing take advantage of this program. However, there is a large scale abuse in this program. There is a commission that has to determine if you meet the standards for receiving this aid, and it is staffed by those who are connected. They often run the companies that are already receiving this aid and therefore have no desire to allow more companies into this special tax zone.
Sunday, December 18, 2011
Civil Society Institute
(Not to sound like a broken record, but..) My next meeting was with Center for Civic Initiative (CCI). CCI has been in operation for 15 years. They have had great success with local reform with two different political parties in power. And to put it lightly, they made me actually feel important. It started with a car to pick me up in Skopje rather than taking the bus (which I was willing and able to do and even tried to convince them that I should do). Then I was taken out to lunch and dropped off in front of my friend’s apartment! And they were super super nice, some of the nicest people I have met yet and they were willing to help!
Once I arrived in Prilep, where their NGO is located, we immediately started talking about them! Their office is near the center, but still on the outskirts of town. They have three rooms, a reception area, small kitchen, and bathroom. And the rooms were very full of furniture or books! I will try my best to organize this interview, but we jumped all over the place with questions and answers!
The civil society sector in MK, according to them, is highly dependant upon donors. The different NGOs fight for the same idea, but with such small funding sources, they compete for people and money. There are a large number of NGOs registered, but many are no longer practicing. Former ministers often see the civil society as a place to retire into- and they create their own special NGO just for them. There are a few more NGOs than the normally accepted one that could be recognized, but there are not any watchdog organizations or any constructive critics. Many NGOS will not be politicized, or rather they will not join any parties or be associated with any political party. This way people will not see the NGOs actions as politicized. If they are seen as neutral then their funding doesn’t depend on whatever party is in power.
CCI tries to have a relationship with the entity and not the people in the positions. They partner with the local government, and are now in the position that they can ask them to try new ways of working without having to work for the party in the elections. In the last 2 years the local and national government and the NGOGOs have fostered a division of NGOs into the Soros NGOs and other NGOs. They tried to create the public opinion that the Soros NGOs are trying to make the country weak intentionally. Some of the people in government see enemies in the NGO/civil society sector because the government people think NGOs are trying to take over their jobs. There is now closer cooperation between the NGOs, partly because they are afraid of taking any action that may cause problems for them in the future. Now you can see NGOs working with the government without criticism from the public. Yet, they are working as a passive NGO sector. No one stood up in Feburary when ethnic tensions rose due to the conflict over the museum shaped as a church in the fortress in Skopje, because this was rather risky. The NGO sector is working as a passive sector right now- no one stands up when things are going badly, because they are afraid of the risks. They are happy that there is an NGO sector. They told me that “Our main concern is that we are lacking a strong partnership between NGOs.” There is no union of NGOs nor is there any cooperation. They even claim there there is no sense of working together because it is extremely difficult to get people to work together- make the meetings or phone calls. When asked why- they admitted that there is a known need, but there are some that disagree that there is a need. There is also a lack of effective action towards NGOs. If the NGOs are acting alone, then there is the idea that they are easy to eliminate, but if there is a network of NGOs trying to work together then the government would be more responsive. They work mostly for their own community rather than the greater community of the nation.
For 15 years there has not been a very active NGO sector. From 1999-2001 a lot of money came into MK due to the different conflicts. Many new NGOs were formed to take this easy money without learning how to write good grant proposals or continue the activities after the easy money was gone. Now CCI tries to get the funds and then implement more locally, often through re-granting procedures, the programs to help local people. Some NGOs are afraid to take action because it may cause problems with the government or local authorities. However, you can see NGOs working with the government with out criticism.
CCI feels that protecting human rights isn’t just the responsibility of the government, but also of the NGO sector. The government claims it is working with grassroots organizations, but this is just an excuse for not being active in critical areas, CCI believes. They even emphasized that it is more true now than before because MK is on the edge of a crisis. No community member or government employee is trying to imitate dialog between the government and the opposition or the ethnic groups of MK. They see no other option but for the NGO/civil society sector to step up and help bring the sides together.
CCICCI is trying to make changes through constructive cooperation and showing them it is important through their work with the kids. As long as they are putting topics that bring reform on the agenda, but that do not criticise the government then it is OK to propose them. The reforms need to be satisfying to both sides; often that means focusing on women’s rights, handicapped people, and human trafficking.
The government has helped create the idea in public that if you criticize the government then you are part of the opposition. There is no ‘mature-ness’ about democracy, according to CCI. The previous government/leaders are the ones who have changed it. There is a greater fear of obstacles, more personal power tendencies, and a lack of democratic experiences. While NGOs are making study visits to see how democracy is functioning in other countries, the government officials are not. Everyone is waiting for others to initiate a network rather than being the ones to initiate the network. That NGO that starts it will have the focus of the government (and it is implied the criticism). But waiting for other to act, CCI states, creates a dark atmosphere for NGOs; soon reality will force them to act with democracy.
CCI was began in 1997. They work with human rights/democracy, capacity building for the NGO sector, and the improvement public sector. They mostly focus on human rights/democracy. They began with refugee education, teaching kids so they didn’t loose their place in school. They helped form children/youth centers around MK. They offered classes and clubs in English Language, debate, theater, social skills, IT. The groups would have some focus on human rights and equality. Many kids were targeted through these extra-curricular activities. Then a different agency took over the camps, and some still function today but CCI does not run them.
After the camps, CCI focused on institutional development and capacity building. They did different studies on how to run an NGO. They received funding to build their own NGO up so they could help others. They want to share their experience and help with deeper cooperation. From the funding that they received to capacity build they also learned the “zig-zag” process. This process states that they go to the community and learn their needs. Then they go back to the board to create a program. When they have an idea, they go back to the community to implement to project.
They have over 80 implemented projects. They have discussed needs with different NGOs. They also deliver training to other NGOs and organizations. They will often give the new NGOs support, they monitor the implementations and assess their success. They believe that this could be applied to all sectors of governmental work. They have a big involvement in the beginning of new NGOs they fund. They have been granted money and through a process of re-granting they have helped over 30 other NGOs (such water meters, healthy, violence) all in the Prelip region. This re-granting has helped their reputation.
Another thing that CCI helps in providing legal aid to victims of human rights violations. They hired a lawyer to provide legal advice on domestic violence or work violations. This is still required in today’s climates, people come to complain to them almost every day. Since 2004 they focus on police violence. Now the lawyer is an internal asset to CCI rather than an external collaborator. Through cooperation with NGOs in Kumanovo, Strumitca, and Skopje all under the coordination of the Skopje organization this way they have almost the entire country covered.
Another thing they work on is prevention of human trafficking by training in schools and in the center of social care. They have developed teacher manuals and tested them in schools. They have lobbied to have the manuals adopted, but so far they have not been successful. MK is both a transit (girls are passed through MK) as well as an origin company (girls originate in MK). They are trying to make people more aware about the problem and what they can do to stop it. Most people who are responsible for the origin are members of the girls family. Most girls are traded for sex and are minors. Human trafficking needs to be recognized, and reported in especially in some areas. Part of the difficulties is the lack of knowledge. The government has called for proposals, but only certain NGOs get money from the government. There is some public perception of human trafficking but it needs more PR to have a higher awareness.
They also work on public administration a bit. They have an office in the municipality to help people become familiar with the NGO sector. They use this mainly to work with the the municipality on the NGO sector. They are working with neighborhood units so they can decide that their needs are locally rather than national government decided. There are 16 communities in the Prilep area. The neighborhoods are able to promote their positions in the municipalities. They are not asking for individual needs but rather the neighborhood action. They are trying to implement these in other countries or municipalities. The neighborhood units are a potential civil society outreach, but they need minimum funds to support volunteerism and lobby for the community.
They have received funding from many foreign donors, such as the US, EU, and individual organizations. However, they have never received funding from the MK government. CCI has applied but there is a very selective approach to who gets the MK funds. While they do not receive monetary funding, the government helps them out non-financially. There is great cooperation between the ministry of education , ombudsman, justice and the interior. Most NGOs have problems with funding a few have received funding through the EU as well as the US. This funding is mostly to new or different NGOs.
Once I arrived in Prilep, where their NGO is located, we immediately started talking about them! Their office is near the center, but still on the outskirts of town. They have three rooms, a reception area, small kitchen, and bathroom. And the rooms were very full of furniture or books! I will try my best to organize this interview, but we jumped all over the place with questions and answers!
The civil society sector in MK, according to them, is highly dependant upon donors. The different NGOs fight for the same idea, but with such small funding sources, they compete for people and money. There are a large number of NGOs registered, but many are no longer practicing. Former ministers often see the civil society as a place to retire into- and they create their own special NGO just for them. There are a few more NGOs than the normally accepted one that could be recognized, but there are not any watchdog organizations or any constructive critics. Many NGOS will not be politicized, or rather they will not join any parties or be associated with any political party. This way people will not see the NGOs actions as politicized. If they are seen as neutral then their funding doesn’t depend on whatever party is in power.
CCI tries to have a relationship with the entity and not the people in the positions. They partner with the local government, and are now in the position that they can ask them to try new ways of working without having to work for the party in the elections. In the last 2 years the local and national government and the NGOGOs have fostered a division of NGOs into the Soros NGOs and other NGOs. They tried to create the public opinion that the Soros NGOs are trying to make the country weak intentionally. Some of the people in government see enemies in the NGO/civil society sector because the government people think NGOs are trying to take over their jobs. There is now closer cooperation between the NGOs, partly because they are afraid of taking any action that may cause problems for them in the future. Now you can see NGOs working with the government without criticism from the public. Yet, they are working as a passive NGO sector. No one stood up in Feburary when ethnic tensions rose due to the conflict over the museum shaped as a church in the fortress in Skopje, because this was rather risky. The NGO sector is working as a passive sector right now- no one stands up when things are going badly, because they are afraid of the risks. They are happy that there is an NGO sector. They told me that “Our main concern is that we are lacking a strong partnership between NGOs.” There is no union of NGOs nor is there any cooperation. They even claim there there is no sense of working together because it is extremely difficult to get people to work together- make the meetings or phone calls. When asked why- they admitted that there is a known need, but there are some that disagree that there is a need. There is also a lack of effective action towards NGOs. If the NGOs are acting alone, then there is the idea that they are easy to eliminate, but if there is a network of NGOs trying to work together then the government would be more responsive. They work mostly for their own community rather than the greater community of the nation.
For 15 years there has not been a very active NGO sector. From 1999-2001 a lot of money came into MK due to the different conflicts. Many new NGOs were formed to take this easy money without learning how to write good grant proposals or continue the activities after the easy money was gone. Now CCI tries to get the funds and then implement more locally, often through re-granting procedures, the programs to help local people. Some NGOs are afraid to take action because it may cause problems with the government or local authorities. However, you can see NGOs working with the government with out criticism.
CCI feels that protecting human rights isn’t just the responsibility of the government, but also of the NGO sector. The government claims it is working with grassroots organizations, but this is just an excuse for not being active in critical areas, CCI believes. They even emphasized that it is more true now than before because MK is on the edge of a crisis. No community member or government employee is trying to imitate dialog between the government and the opposition or the ethnic groups of MK. They see no other option but for the NGO/civil society sector to step up and help bring the sides together.
CCICCI is trying to make changes through constructive cooperation and showing them it is important through their work with the kids. As long as they are putting topics that bring reform on the agenda, but that do not criticise the government then it is OK to propose them. The reforms need to be satisfying to both sides; often that means focusing on women’s rights, handicapped people, and human trafficking.
The government has helped create the idea in public that if you criticize the government then you are part of the opposition. There is no ‘mature-ness’ about democracy, according to CCI. The previous government/leaders are the ones who have changed it. There is a greater fear of obstacles, more personal power tendencies, and a lack of democratic experiences. While NGOs are making study visits to see how democracy is functioning in other countries, the government officials are not. Everyone is waiting for others to initiate a network rather than being the ones to initiate the network. That NGO that starts it will have the focus of the government (and it is implied the criticism). But waiting for other to act, CCI states, creates a dark atmosphere for NGOs; soon reality will force them to act with democracy.
CCI was began in 1997. They work with human rights/democracy, capacity building for the NGO sector, and the improvement public sector. They mostly focus on human rights/democracy. They began with refugee education, teaching kids so they didn’t loose their place in school. They helped form children/youth centers around MK. They offered classes and clubs in English Language, debate, theater, social skills, IT. The groups would have some focus on human rights and equality. Many kids were targeted through these extra-curricular activities. Then a different agency took over the camps, and some still function today but CCI does not run them.
After the camps, CCI focused on institutional development and capacity building. They did different studies on how to run an NGO. They received funding to build their own NGO up so they could help others. They want to share their experience and help with deeper cooperation. From the funding that they received to capacity build they also learned the “zig-zag” process. This process states that they go to the community and learn their needs. Then they go back to the board to create a program. When they have an idea, they go back to the community to implement to project.
They have over 80 implemented projects. They have discussed needs with different NGOs. They also deliver training to other NGOs and organizations. They will often give the new NGOs support, they monitor the implementations and assess their success. They believe that this could be applied to all sectors of governmental work. They have a big involvement in the beginning of new NGOs they fund. They have been granted money and through a process of re-granting they have helped over 30 other NGOs (such water meters, healthy, violence) all in the Prelip region. This re-granting has helped their reputation.
Another thing that CCI helps in providing legal aid to victims of human rights violations. They hired a lawyer to provide legal advice on domestic violence or work violations. This is still required in today’s climates, people come to complain to them almost every day. Since 2004 they focus on police violence. Now the lawyer is an internal asset to CCI rather than an external collaborator. Through cooperation with NGOs in Kumanovo, Strumitca, and Skopje all under the coordination of the Skopje organization this way they have almost the entire country covered.
Another thing they work on is prevention of human trafficking by training in schools and in the center of social care. They have developed teacher manuals and tested them in schools. They have lobbied to have the manuals adopted, but so far they have not been successful. MK is both a transit (girls are passed through MK) as well as an origin company (girls originate in MK). They are trying to make people more aware about the problem and what they can do to stop it. Most people who are responsible for the origin are members of the girls family. Most girls are traded for sex and are minors. Human trafficking needs to be recognized, and reported in especially in some areas. Part of the difficulties is the lack of knowledge. The government has called for proposals, but only certain NGOs get money from the government. There is some public perception of human trafficking but it needs more PR to have a higher awareness.
They also work on public administration a bit. They have an office in the municipality to help people become familiar with the NGO sector. They use this mainly to work with the the municipality on the NGO sector. They are working with neighborhood units so they can decide that their needs are locally rather than national government decided. There are 16 communities in the Prilep area. The neighborhoods are able to promote their positions in the municipalities. They are not asking for individual needs but rather the neighborhood action. They are trying to implement these in other countries or municipalities. The neighborhood units are a potential civil society outreach, but they need minimum funds to support volunteerism and lobby for the community.
They have received funding from many foreign donors, such as the US, EU, and individual organizations. However, they have never received funding from the MK government. CCI has applied but there is a very selective approach to who gets the MK funds. While they do not receive monetary funding, the government helps them out non-financially. There is great cooperation between the ministry of education , ombudsman, justice and the interior. Most NGOs have problems with funding a few have received funding through the EU as well as the US. This funding is mostly to new or different NGOs.
Monday, October 31, 2011
Civil Society and Citizenship
Now we turn to more of the research I began about the civil society sector! I know it took awhile, but remember at first I wanted to focus on the women’s NGOs, so this would have been background to a women’s rights focus. That or I probably didn’t discover the book until later. I find it best to start off with a definition of civil society, for I find it is hard to explain to those who are not sure what it is already. I often find myself relying on examples alone. “You know The Red Cross? Amnesty International? National Organization of Women? THOSE are NGOs.” In comes Lester Salamon with the save: “they are all organizations that operate outside the state apparatus, that do not distribute profits, and that citizens are free to join or not join to pursue common purposes” (Salamon et al, xvii). In addition there are 5 characteristics that are required of civil society organizations (Salamon et al, 3-4):
The importance of the civil society sector has began to be seen as “strategically important participants in this search for a ‘middle way’ between sole reliance on the market and sole reliance on the state that now seems to be increasingly underway” (Salomon et al, 5). There is a general acceptance that the government can not serve all of the needs of its citizens, thus the civil society sector is beginning to bridge that gap between public and private services. The civil society sector is also considered a critical part of a democratic society.
Part of being part of a member of a democratic society is the right of citizenship. Citizenship can define “the limits of state power and where a civil society or the private sphere of free individuals begin” (Yuval-Davis & Werbner, 2). In fact, democratic citizenship maintains the right to be different. Yet, while allowing different parties to emerge, and being a part of the nation, each person has a different view of citizenship because citizenship encapsulates specific, historically inflected, cultural and social assumptions about similarity and difference” (Yuval-Davis & Werber, 3). Further, Yuval-Davis and Werber argue that citizenship is at the intersection of the state, civil society and an individual intersect.
But for me? The best quote I have found is this: Unlike nationalism, which grounds itself in past myths of common origin or culture, citizenship raises its eyes towards the future to common destinies” (Yuval-Davis & Werber, 8).
Nira Yuval-Davis & Pnina Werbner, “Women & the New Discourse of Citizenship,” in Women, Citizen & Difference, 1-38, ed by Nira Yuval-Davis and Prina Werber. London: Zed Books, 1999.
global Civil Society Dimensions of the Non-Profit sector, ed Lester Slamon, Helmut Anheier, Regina List, Stefan Toepler, S. Wojciech Sokolowski and Associates. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 1999.
“Preface”
“Civil Society in Comparitive Perspective” 3-39
- organizations: they have an institutional presence and structure
- private: they are institutions separate from the state.
- non-profit distributing: they do not return profits to their managers or to a set of owners
- self governing: they are fundamentally in control of their own affairs
- voluntary: membership in them is not legally required and they attract some level of voluntary contribution of time or money
The importance of the civil society sector has began to be seen as “strategically important participants in this search for a ‘middle way’ between sole reliance on the market and sole reliance on the state that now seems to be increasingly underway” (Salomon et al, 5). There is a general acceptance that the government can not serve all of the needs of its citizens, thus the civil society sector is beginning to bridge that gap between public and private services. The civil society sector is also considered a critical part of a democratic society.
Part of being part of a member of a democratic society is the right of citizenship. Citizenship can define “the limits of state power and where a civil society or the private sphere of free individuals begin” (Yuval-Davis & Werbner, 2). In fact, democratic citizenship maintains the right to be different. Yet, while allowing different parties to emerge, and being a part of the nation, each person has a different view of citizenship because citizenship encapsulates specific, historically inflected, cultural and social assumptions about similarity and difference” (Yuval-Davis & Werber, 3). Further, Yuval-Davis and Werber argue that citizenship is at the intersection of the state, civil society and an individual intersect.
But for me? The best quote I have found is this: Unlike nationalism, which grounds itself in past myths of common origin or culture, citizenship raises its eyes towards the future to common destinies” (Yuval-Davis & Werber, 8).
Nira Yuval-Davis & Pnina Werbner, “Women & the New Discourse of Citizenship,” in Women, Citizen & Difference, 1-38, ed by Nira Yuval-Davis and Prina Werber. London: Zed Books, 1999.
global Civil Society Dimensions of the Non-Profit sector, ed Lester Slamon, Helmut Anheier, Regina List, Stefan Toepler, S. Wojciech Sokolowski and Associates. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, 1999.
“Preface”
“Civil Society in Comparitive Perspective” 3-39
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)